Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Izzet Prowess | alexander rosdahl | 11-3 | None |
| Izzet Prowess | ar3nitas | 8-1 | 1st in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12774495 |
| Izzet Prowess | florian lindhoudt | 10-4 | None |
| Izzet Prowess | thomas mechin | 10-4 | None |
| Izzet Prowess | emanuele melotti | 8-6 | None |
| Izzet Prowess | yoshitaka fujino | 6-2 | None |
| Izzet Prowess | ryohei kobayashi | 6-2 | None |
| Izzet Prowess | sephisephi | 7-5 | None |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
Boros Burn , Grixis Control , Izzet Prowess , Jeskai Oculus , Mono-Red Aggro
Meta Performance Analysis
Finale of Promise ranks #1353 out of approximately 5129 cards in raw efficiency (top 26%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
Red average: 49.2%
Performance compared to other Red cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Finale of Promise is a solid card that performs above average in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 2
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 6.90 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 2 mana, the average win rate in the format is 47.5%. Finale of Promise has a win rate of 57.9%, making it 21.9% better than other 2-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grim Lavamancer | Creature — Human Wizard | 5 | 77.6% | 1 |
| Blood Moon | Enchantment | 6 | 63.9% | 2 |
| Simian Spirit Guide | Creature — Ape Spirit | 8 | 61.5% | 1 |
| Electrodominance | Instant | 7 | 59.0% | 1 |
| Ancestral Vision | Sorcery | 7 | 59.0% | 1 |
| Crashing Footfalls | Sorcery | 7 | 59.0% | 1 |
| As Foretold | Enchantment | 7 | 59.0% | 1 |
| Force of Negation | Instant | 7 | 58.8% | 1 |
| Greater Gargadon | Creature — Beast | 6 | 56.4% | 1 |
| Restore Balance | Sorcery | 6 | 56.4% | 1 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Finale of Promise than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blood Moon | Enchantment | 3 | 5 | 75.0% | 55.7% | +19.3% |
| Grim Lavamancer | Creature — Human Wizard | 1 | 5 | 76.9% | 57.7% | +19.2% |
| Leyline of Sanctity | Enchantment | 4 | 5 | 69.2% | 54.2% | +15.1% |
| Simian Spirit Guide | Creature — Ape Spirit | 3 | 6 | 70.6% | 56.6% | +14.0% |
| Serum Visions | Sorcery | 1 | 9 | 69.8% | 56.3% | +13.5% |
| Izzet Charm | Instant | 2 | 9 | 68.3% | 55.9% | +12.4% |
| Force of Negation | Instant | 3 | 5 | 69.0% | 57.1% | +11.9% |
| Fry | Instant | 2 | 9 | 68.4% | 56.8% | +11.6% |
| Chart a Course | Sorcery | 2 | 7 | 66.7% | 56.5% | +10.1% |
| Brainstorm | Instant | 1 | 6 | 66.7% | 57.1% | +9.6% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Izzet Prowess | 53 | 5.4% | 48.3% |
| Mono-Red Aggro | 3 | 0.7% | 54.8% |
| Jeskai Oculus | 2 | 0.3% | 25.0% |
| Boros Burn | 1 | 0.2% | 25.0% |
| Grixis Control | 1 | 33.3% | 0.0% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.